[/vc_column_text]

When considering a hair transplant, two of the most advanced techniques available today are Sapphire FUE and DHI (Direct Hair Implantation). Both methods provide natural results, but they differ in approach, healing time, and overall effectiveness.
What Is Sapphire FUE Hair Transplant?
Sapphire FUE (Follicular Unit Extraction) is an upgraded version of the traditional FUE technique. It involves using sapphire-tipped blades instead of steel blades to create recipient sites for implanting hair follicles. Key Features of Sapphire FUE: – Hair follicles are extracted one by one from the donor area. – Incisions are made using a sapphire blade, allowing for smaller, more precise cuts. – Grafts are implanted into the incisions manually. Advantages of Sapphire FUE: – Higher graft density: More follicles can be implanted close together. – Faster healing: Smaller incisions result in less tissue trauma. – More natural results: The sapphire blade allows for better control of hair angles.
What Is DHI Hair Transplant?
DHI (Direct Hair Implantation) is a newer technique that uses a Choi implanter pen to directly implant hair follicles without the need for pre-made incisions. Key Features of DHI: – Hair follicles are extracted and immediately implanted using the implanter pen. – No need for pre-opening channels, making the process faster. – The procedure is highly precise, allowing for individual follicle control. Advantages of DHI: – Minimally invasive: No pre-cut incisions, reducing trauma. – Higher graft survival rate: Less time outside the scalp improves graft viability. – Ideal for smaller areas: Perfect for hairline restoration and increasing density.
Key Differences Between Sapphire FUE and DHI
Feature | Sapphire FUE | DHI |
---|---|---|
Extraction Method | Follicles extracted and stored before implantation | Follicles extracted and implanted immediately |
Incision Type | Pre-made channels using sapphire blades | Implanter pen directly inserts follicles |
Recovery Time | 7-10 days | 5-7 days |
Best for | Large bald areas, high graft numbers | Smaller areas, high-precision hairlines |
Cost | More affordable | Slightly more expensive due to advanced tools |
Which Technique Is Right for You?
Choose Sapphire FUE if: – You need a high number of grafts for large bald areas. – You want faster healing and higher density. – You are looking for a cost-effective option. Choose DHI if: – You want a more natural-looking hairline. – You prefer a minimally invasive procedure. – You need higher precision and graft survival rate.
Choosing the Right Technique with Istanbul Care:
-
- Personalized Hair Transplantation Consultation: Istanbul Care offers personalized consultations, considering factors like hair type, density, and patient expectations to recommend the most suitable technique for effective hair restoration.
- Cutting-Edge Hair Transplantation Facilities: Equipped with state-of-the-art technology, Istanbul Care ensures patients receive top-tier care throughout their hair journey.
- Thorough Post-Transplant Care: Both Sapphire FUE and DHI procedures at Istanbul Care come with comprehensive aftercare, ensuring a smooth recovery and maximizing the success of the hair transplantation.
Choose Excellence at Istanbul Care! Schedule Your Consultation for Sapphire FUE or DHI Hair Transplant Today!
In the realm of hair transplantation, the choice between Sapphire FUE and DHI hinges on individual preferences and guidance from seasoned professionals. Istanbul Care, dedicated to excellence and a patient-centric approach, stands as the go-to destination for effective and personalized hair transplant solutions. Embark on your journey to hair restoration excellence with Istanbul Care – where precision meets innovation for a fuller, more confident you.
Note: To schedule a hair transplantation consultation with Istanbul Care or learn more about Sapphire FUE and DHI, visit Istanbul-Care.com.
Speak with our expert Hair Transplantation specialists

Speak with our expert Hair Transplantation specialists
We’re ready to answer your questions
FAQs About FUE Hair Transplant vs DHI in Turkey
The main distinction lies in the implantation process. In Sapphire FUE, channels are first created using a sapphire blade before implanting the follicles. In DHI, follicles are implanted directly using a Choi pen, eliminating the need for prior channel creation.
Both techniques are minimally invasive and offer relatively quick recovery times. However, DHI may allow for a slightly faster recovery due to the direct implantation method, which causes less trauma to the scalp.
Both methods aim to minimize scarring. Sapphire FUE uses sharp sapphire blades to create precise incisions, leading to minimal scarring. DHI utilizes a Choi pen for direct implantation, resulting in even smaller incisions and potentially less visible scarring.
DHI allows for precise control over the depth, angle, and direction of each follicle during implantation, making it particularly suitable for achieving higher hair density, especially in smaller or more specific areas.
Yes, DHI procedures often tend to be more expensive than Sapphire FUE due to the specialized tools required and the meticulous nature of the procedure, which demands more time and skill.
Both techniques have high success rates, often exceeding 95%, when performed by skilled professionals. The choice between the two should be based on individual needs, hair loss patterns, and consultation with a qualified surgeon.
[/vc_column_text]

When considering a hair transplant, two of the most advanced techniques available today are Sapphire FUE and DHI (Direct Hair Implantation). Both methods provide natural results, but they differ in approach, healing time, and overall effectiveness.
What Is Sapphire FUE Hair Transplant?
Sapphire FUE (Follicular Unit Extraction) is an upgraded version of the traditional FUE technique. It involves using sapphire-tipped blades instead of steel blades to create recipient sites for implanting hair follicles. Key Features of Sapphire FUE: – Hair follicles are extracted one by one from the donor area. – Incisions are made using a sapphire blade, allowing for smaller, more precise cuts. – Grafts are implanted into the incisions manually. Advantages of Sapphire FUE: – Higher graft density: More follicles can be implanted close together. – Faster healing: Smaller incisions result in less tissue trauma. – More natural results: The sapphire blade allows for better control of hair angles.
What Is DHI Hair Transplant?
DHI (Direct Hair Implantation) is a newer technique that uses a Choi implanter pen to directly implant hair follicles without the need for pre-made incisions. Key Features of DHI: – Hair follicles are extracted and immediately implanted using the implanter pen. – No need for pre-opening channels, making the process faster. – The procedure is highly precise, allowing for individual follicle control. Advantages of DHI: – Minimally invasive: No pre-cut incisions, reducing trauma. – Higher graft survival rate: Less time outside the scalp improves graft viability. – Ideal for smaller areas: Perfect for hairline restoration and increasing density.
Key Differences Between Sapphire FUE and DHI
Feature | Sapphire FUE | DHI |
---|---|---|
Extraction Method | Follicles extracted and stored before implantation | Follicles extracted and implanted immediately |
Incision Type | Pre-made channels using sapphire blades | Implanter pen directly inserts follicles |
Recovery Time | 7-10 days | 5-7 days |
Best for | Large bald areas, high graft numbers | Smaller areas, high-precision hairlines |
Cost | More affordable | Slightly more expensive due to advanced tools |
Which Technique Is Right for You?
Choose Sapphire FUE if: – You need a high number of grafts for large bald areas. – You want faster healing and higher density. – You are looking for a cost-effective option. Choose DHI if: – You want a more natural-looking hairline. – You prefer a minimally invasive procedure. – You need higher precision and graft survival rate.
Choosing the Right Technique with Istanbul Care:
-
- Personalized Hair Transplantation Consultation: Istanbul Care offers personalized consultations, considering factors like hair type, density, and patient expectations to recommend the most suitable technique for effective hair restoration.
- Cutting-Edge Hair Transplantation Facilities: Equipped with state-of-the-art technology, Istanbul Care ensures patients receive top-tier care throughout their hair journey.
- Thorough Post-Transplant Care: Both Sapphire FUE and DHI procedures at Istanbul Care come with comprehensive aftercare, ensuring a smooth recovery and maximizing the success of the hair transplantation.
Choose Excellence at Istanbul Care! Schedule Your Consultation for Sapphire FUE or DHI Hair Transplant Today!
In the realm of hair transplantation, the choice between Sapphire FUE and DHI hinges on individual preferences and guidance from seasoned professionals. Istanbul Care, dedicated to excellence and a patient-centric approach, stands as the go-to destination for effective and personalized hair transplant solutions. Embark on your journey to hair restoration excellence with Istanbul Care – where precision meets innovation for a fuller, more confident you.
Note: To schedule a hair transplantation consultation with Istanbul Care or learn more about Sapphire FUE and DHI, visit Istanbul-Care.com.
Speak with our expert Hair Transplantation specialists

Speak with our expert Hair Transplantation specialists
We’re ready to answer your questions
FAQs About FUE Hair Transplant vs DHI in Turkey
The main distinction lies in the implantation process. In Sapphire FUE, channels are first created using a sapphire blade before implanting the follicles. In DHI, follicles are implanted directly using a Choi pen, eliminating the need for prior channel creation.
Both techniques are minimally invasive and offer relatively quick recovery times. However, DHI may allow for a slightly faster recovery due to the direct implantation method, which causes less trauma to the scalp.
Both methods aim to minimize scarring. Sapphire FUE uses sharp sapphire blades to create precise incisions, leading to minimal scarring. DHI utilizes a Choi pen for direct implantation, resulting in even smaller incisions and potentially less visible scarring.
DHI allows for precise control over the depth, angle, and direction of each follicle during implantation, making it particularly suitable for achieving higher hair density, especially in smaller or more specific areas.
Yes, DHI procedures often tend to be more expensive than Sapphire FUE due to the specialized tools required and the meticulous nature of the procedure, which demands more time and skill.
Both techniques have high success rates, often exceeding 95%, when performed by skilled professionals. The choice between the two should be based on individual needs, hair loss patterns, and consultation with a qualified surgeon.
Speak with our expert Hair Transplantation specialists

Speak with our expert Hair Transplantation specialists
We’re ready to answer your questions
FAQs About FUE Hair Transplant vs DHI in Turkey
The main distinction lies in the implantation process. In Sapphire FUE, channels are first created using a sapphire blade before implanting the follicles. In DHI, follicles are implanted directly using a Choi pen, eliminating the need for prior channel creation.
Both techniques are minimally invasive and offer relatively quick recovery times. However, DHI may allow for a slightly faster recovery due to the direct implantation method, which causes less trauma to the scalp.
Both methods aim to minimize scarring. Sapphire FUE uses sharp sapphire blades to create precise incisions, leading to minimal scarring. DHI utilizes a Choi pen for direct implantation, resulting in even smaller incisions and potentially less visible scarring.
DHI allows for precise control over the depth, angle, and direction of each follicle during implantation, making it particularly suitable for achieving higher hair density, especially in smaller or more specific areas.
Yes, DHI procedures often tend to be more expensive than Sapphire FUE due to the specialized tools required and the meticulous nature of the procedure, which demands more time and skill.
Both techniques have high success rates, often exceeding 95%, when performed by skilled professionals. The choice between the two should be based on individual needs, hair loss patterns, and consultation with a qualified surgeon.